image

image

 
JOIN 800,000+ MEMBERS JOINJOIN Cancel
image






Adoption Forums®

Members List Photos Events Local Adoption Support Search Arcade Reviews Membership Upgrade
Welcome to the Forums. Register
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register before you can post or search: click here to proceed. To start viewing messages, select a forum below that you would like to view or click View All of Todays Posts.
Forum Categories
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2012, 06:52 AM
adoptionfindblog adoptionfindblog is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Total Points: 20,503.88
Donate
AdoptionFind: Adoption Not Magic: Babies Donít Disappear, They Grow Up

Response to a comment on the rights of birthmothers.

Babies Donít Disappear, They Grow Up

I would love to hear your thoughts on this one.
Reply With Quote
Adoption Reunion Information
We'll Search for You!
Washington
Click here to visit Adoption.com Registry
Don't miss out on finding your match at Adoption.com's Registry. For just $9.99 per year we will do the searching for you. Receive notifications automatically. Plus...find out who is searching for you!
Adoption.com Registry
 

  #2  
Old 03-16-2012, 09:31 AM
JustPeachy's Avatar
JustPeachy JustPeachy is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,968
Total Points: 51,991.35
Donate
Quote:
Since the 1970′s birth parents could have chosen an open adoption if they didnít care about privacy. The majority didnít.Ē

I can't read the whole article right now, but this caught my attention. Where on earth could you choose an OA in the 1970s??? I placed in early '82, and never even heard of OA. I think about 2 or 3 years later, I was watching Phil Donahue and they did a piece on OAs, which were very, very new at that time.

In terms of protecting my privacy, I was never promised confidentiality, nor did I want it. I was told that if I kept my information updated at the agency, and my son ever sought me out when he was of age, I would be contacted. Now, having said that, if I DIDN'T want to be contacted, I wouldn't have updated my information all those years. But regardless, I never expected privacy or harbored the feelings that if my son sought me out, I would not accept contact.

I realize some first moms may want to keep that door shut, but I was never one of them, so I'm not sure who these women are who expect confidentiality. Most first moms I know accept contact, in fact, I can't think of one who refused it, though I do hear of this happening from time to time. I just don't think it's the norm.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2012, 09:41 AM
MeriAnn MeriAnn is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 39
Total Points: 3,905.78
Donate
I guess that the comment “How sad for all those birth parents who chose adoption over abortion expecting to be able to have privacy. Since the 1970′s birth parents could have chosen an open adoption if they didn’t care about privacy. The majority didn’t.” is a valid point.

Being born in '75, times then were different. I dont think open adoption was very common....at least not that I have ever heard. The whole issue of adoption is complicated. Everyone involved has their own rights and feelings.

In the province where I live, we adult adoptees could request identifying info starting Nov. 2004. It was announced far in advance that if the birth parent wanted to file a veto to prevent the release of info they could. In turn they could apply to have identifying info about the adoptees and we could also file a veto to prevent the release. I didnt apply for my file until fall of 2009. I dont know how it works in other areas, but it seems like a fair system. I would have been very disappointed if they had filed the veto though.

I am not sure how I want to proceed with this as I am trying to consider the situation and the feelings of all involved. I have found some peace though just knowing my own name and details.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2012, 10:03 AM
Dickons Dickons is offline
Adoptee

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,181
Total Points: 1,444,827.48
Donate
Anyone who suggest all mothers chose adoption over abortion isn't worth responding to because they have a mindset that "all mothers who chose adoption (using chose very loosely) automatically were going to have an abortion".

People who believe in stereotypes cannot be reasoned with, let alone those who believe mothers main reason for not aborting and choosing adoption instead because it would give them privacy - have very little if any understanding of what mothers actually intended or wanted back then, or why.

Kind regards,
Dickons
__________________
ďTreat a man as he is, and he will remain as he is. Treat a man as he could be, and he will become what he should be.Ē ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2012, 03:04 PM
RavenSong's Avatar
RavenSong RavenSong is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,189
Total Points: 179,773.85
Donate
Vicki,

The woman who posted that comment on your blog is terribly misinformed. I can assure you that open adoption was not an option during the 1970's. I first heard of OA around the mid-1980's...and when I surrendered my son to adoption in 1972, there was NO other option than traditional closed adoption.

I hate it when people who have not walked in the shoes of a natural mother speak on our "behalf" to justify not granting adoptees the legal right to access their original birth certificates or any of their files. I was never promised any sort of confidentiality iin 1972. I have poured through my copies of all the legal paperwork and documents, and there is nothing said at all about any so-called right to privacy. After being an activist and advocate for adoptee rights and adoption reform since 1979, I'm convinced that these cries the past couple years about birth mothers not wanting their children to have the same rights as every other human being in our country are simply a subterfuge, a smokescreen if you will.

Every child on this planet should have the absolute right to know his or her own heritage, their ancestral bloodlines, their original names, regularly updated medical histories, and meeting their natural parents, both mother and father. It's a weak cop-out to deny adoptees the legal right to any of these things in the name of a birth mother's "right to privacy."

The abortion aspect is especially troublesome to me. My decision as a young 17-year-old teenage girl to relinquish my baby had absolutely nothing to do with my decision not to terminate the pregnancy. I did consider abortion for an hour or two the day I found out I was pregnant, but I decided that was something I didn't want to do. I didn't even make the decision to surrender until my seventh month of pregnancy, long after the time window had closed for an abortion.

I'm glad I found your blog...it looks like you have a lot of really good things for people to think about. I've bookmarked your site and will be back!
__________________
~~Raven~~

What does not kill me, makes me stronger. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, 1888, German Philosopher (1844-1900)

Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Points Per Thread View: 1.00
Points Per Thread: 15.00
Points Per Reply: 5.00


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:51 PM.