Family Forums
Parenting Forums
Pregnancy Forums
Adoption Forums
Fertility Forums






Members List Photos Events Local Adoption Support Search Arcade Reviews Membership Upgrade
Welcome to the Forums. Register
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register before you can post or search: click here to proceed. To start viewing messages, select a forum below that you would like to view or click View All of Todays Posts.
Forum Categories
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2008, 09:47 AM
TryingtoComeHome's Avatar
TryingtoComeHome TryingtoComeHome is offline
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 112
Total Points: 5,477.98
Donate
Recent CNA post Question to Rule #5

I was hoping to get some help on this Rule that was posted yesterday by the CNA.
Here is the rule:

"V. Finally, an appeal is made to all biological mothers or fathers who have voluntarily given their children up for adoption in the years 2005 to 2007, as well as those who have been subjected to coercion or deception and anyone who knows of them, to present themselves at the Attorney General's Office."

We currently have a trip planned to go back to Guatemala to visit friends from Guatemala we meet during our long journey to bring our daughter home. I lived in Guatemala for 9 months with my daughter while waiting for the adoption to complete. I feel our adoption was 100% legal with no corruption but there is no way for us to know for sure. My question is do we stand any risk of problems going back there? Our adoption took 15 months and completed December 2007. We have all of our daughters legal paperwork. We have also visited once before since her arrival to the US. This will be our second trip back since the adoption completion.

Im a little nervous after what we went through in the adoption. The rule is very strange and Im not sure what they are trying to accomplish. We leave at the beginning of next week so any help would be appreciated.
__________________
Sunshine Born 9-26-06
Referral 10-12-06
1st PGN May 07
2nd PGN July 07
Kod 9-26-07 (yes our daughters Birthday)
3rd PGN Sept 28th 07
Oct 5th, 07 2nd Reviewers desk
Out Approved 11/21
BC Villa Nueva 11/22
Passport 11/23
Orange11/26
2nd DNA Taken 11/28
2nd DNA Received at USE 12/5
Pink 12/6
Embassy Appt 12/14
Home Forever 12/18


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-21-2008, 05:10 PM
dmg0703 dmg0703 is offline
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 131
Total Points: 2,564.62
Donate
Just a guess; I am wondering if a) CNA is looking to somehow keep track of the birthmoms that relinquished their children, even if it was before CNA existed; b) CNA is looking back at historical cases for potential fraud? Not sure what they can do if it is point B, if the adoptions are already complete.

As we know, we can probably guess the intentions forever until we know the true story
__________________
DS from Guatemala

12/29/06 - received referral of baby boy
07/14/07 - Pre Approval
07/25/07 - PGN
08/08/07 - PGN Kick Out # 1
08/21/07 - Resubmit
10/03/07 - PGN Kick Out # 2
10/03/07 - Resubmitted same day
11/21/07 - PGN OUT!!
12/21/07 - 2nd DNA taken
01/07/08 - 2nd DNA at USE, awaiting PINK
01/29/08 - Embassy Appt
01/31/08 - HOME
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Points Per Thread View: 1.00
Points Per Thread: 15.00
Points Per Reply: 5.00


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 AM.