[Archive]

NEXT THING YOU KNOW THEY WILL BE SUBJECTING THE NEWBORN TO BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS OF THE
ADOPTERS,,,TO TRY AND MAKE IT "LIKE THEIR OWN"....ABUSIVE TO BABY AND SICK,SICK

[Archive]

Originally Posted By Neil

Hardly.

There is significant benefit to the baby having breast milk, even as a small fraction of total nourishment.

Why does this bother you so?

[Archive]

No actually you can now adopt a fertilized embryo and have it implanted into the amom. That's what's next it's better than having them destroyed. I know we can put them into orphanages too...

[Archive]

My goodness! Save em all! There are far more vultures than embryos around.Not enough to go around to put in orphanages...

[Archive]

Nothing bothers me about a baby getting nourishment from their Mothers.It bothers me that they are being used to satisfy infertiles egos...and that is NO nourishment,,,just perversion.

[Archive]

Originally Posted By Hardly

The child is NOT getting breast "milk". Not even a small fraction. Why are you so blind to the truth?
Only a Mother can breast feed a child. Anything else is perversion. And should be outlawed as all perverted child molestation IS. NO DIFFERENCE.None,what so ever!!

[Archive]

Originally Posted By Neil,,,,or neilly?

Why are you trying to be a mommy? When you are suppose to be a DADDY????/ PERVERT.

[Archive]

I SUPPOSE MEN TRYING TO BE MOMMYS OR WOMEN THAT WANTS TO BE MEN AND ADOPTS A BABY,THINK IT IS POSSIBLE. THEY HAVE A "DIFFERENT" VIEW ON EVERYTHING AND NONE OF IT IS CORRECT.

[Archive]

Originally Posted By Melissa

I am a first mother whos child was forced into adoption, it is a proven fact that ALL women...and even some men can produce milk with the right prodding and pills. Though I do not think its sick or perverted that an amom would chose to breastfeed, I do not think that it would be as healthy for the child as his/her first mothers milk. With my third child she had an operation when she was born, thus I couldnt breastfeed, I had a TON of milk from having to pump that my baby was not able to drink, I dontated it to the other babies that were unable to get breastmilk, and look through the medical remifunctions of this. A mothers milk is produced to the exact nurishment as her child needs, dont ask me how even the scientist dont know yet. Breast milk is the best thing for the baby, still whether it be given by first mother or adoptive mother, I still would be leary about it if you were to take pills to lactate, thus not really creating milk, it would be formula to the baby. I think it would be possibly emotionally damaging for a baby if an amom chose to breastfeed, the child just torn from the only mother he/she knew and put on someone elses breast would be very confused, and anyone that says a baby doesnt remember his/her firstmother for a life time is just kidding themeselves. I hope I helped with my input, I got my information on breast milk from the childrens hospital ICU in Vancouver, you might want to look there.
Melissa