|
An absolute need to limit? Really. So that would make it okay to stop bparents from having kids if they abused them, right? How about drug addicts? If they have so many drug addicted children then it would be neglectful not to stop them from procreating right?
The government has no right to do any of those things. Nor should they decide a family size based on some number they pick. Each case should be individual decided and not based on the family situation not on some preselected number.
I also don't know any parents getting rich off of state subsidy. The amount paid to parents is very minimal.
Yes, there are cases where bad parents slip through the system and children die. It's horrible. But limiting the number of children allowed in all adoptive homes isn't going to change that at all.
|