View Single Post
  #18  
Old 11-25-2008, 03:29 AM
hkolln's Avatar
hkolln hkolln is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,276
Total Points: 49,461.21
Donate
Unfortunately not all SW's research relatives in the beginning of the case. They don't ask the bioparents for resources til months or even a year into the case. This also leaves the relatives as looking like they didn't do anything to try and have placement and it allows the FP's to get attached and the child to get attached. This shouldn't be happening but it is. Unfortunately there really is no straight answer. Sometimes it is better to keep the child where he/she is in the FP's home. I don't think it's right for a SW to drag her feet for placement decision (when TPR is inevidable) and then the child loses out on a bio relative placement that is qualified. It happens alot from what I have heard...SW's bogged down with too many cases and the courts dragging out permanency. It just makes it so much harder for the kids.
__________________
Mom to 2 girls-age 10 and 15

1st MAPP class: 9/9/2006
MAPP class completed: 9/30/2006
Home study completed: 11/2006
Home study submitted for approval: 11/14/2006
Foster License approved! 11/22/2006
Flew to visit Niece for 3 wks 3/2007
Judge rules placement with us 5/2007

Leaving to bring Niece home 6/15/2007
Niece is offically part of our family 6/30/2007
TPR Bio Dad by default 8/9/2007
TPR Bio Mom voluntary surrender 8/9/2007
Adoption subsidy agreement approved and signed 05/2008

Adoption finalization date 7/18/2008! YEAH





Reply With Quote