View Single Post
  #22  
Old 11-22-2008, 10:49 AM
hkolln's Avatar
hkolln hkolln is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,275
Total Points: 49,389.77
Donate
Unfortunately "preference" is not the same as forcing placement. It is normally up to CPS to decide whom placement is with. They don't have to place with relatives in every single case....I know I found that out the hard way and had to fight too. As for "preference" that can be defined as only "Grandparents" or something else and if the Grandparents say NO then they don't have to look at other relatives. We even had my SIL on our side too whom stated she'd sign away rights if our niece was placed with us. Eventually it did happen but only after we did the same thing-contacted from the SW up to the Governor's office and even our state representative. Unfortunately the laws a so vague on relative placement that CPS can use that against relatives.

And I'm not saying unsafe or uncleared relatives either. I don't think if the relative is not a safe place for any child they should take placement. I'm only speaking of the relatives that are cleared (such as how we went thru the entire foster care licensing).
__________________
Mom to 2 girls-age 10 and 15

1st MAPP class: 9/9/2006
MAPP class completed: 9/30/2006
Home study completed: 11/2006
Home study submitted for approval: 11/14/2006
Foster License approved! 11/22/2006
Flew to visit Niece for 3 wks 3/2007
Judge rules placement with us 5/2007

Leaving to bring Niece home 6/15/2007
Niece is offically part of our family 6/30/2007
TPR Bio Dad by default 8/9/2007
TPR Bio Mom voluntary surrender 8/9/2007
Adoption subsidy agreement approved and signed 05/2008

Adoption finalization date 7/18/2008! YEAH





Reply With Quote