View Single Post
  #3  
Old 05-16-2008, 06:15 PM
SKL SKL is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,416
Total Points: 112,079.10
Donate
I didn't vote because although pretty much all of those things crossed my mind, I didn't dwell on them long enough for them to be "serious" considerations. I can see how people would be very ambivalent about some of these choices if their cases were long or had major roadblocks. If it seemed to be really the only way to give a home to a child who needed one, and the risk of detection were low, maybe I would consider doing something that was against the black-and-white rules, provided I was sure nobody was getting hurt as a result. Thank goodness my case never got to the point where I had to be tested in that regard.
__________________
Mom of Norma and Sara

********************************
6/06 began paper chase
9/06 home study completed
10/06 I-171
11/06 dossier completed
1/25/07 referral of Norma
1/26/07 referral of Sara
2/23/07 DNA test x 2
3/6/07 It's a match x 2!
4/23/07(?) out of FC
4/26-4/30 vist trip
5/5 & 5/7 PA x 2
5/24 "In" PGN
6/15 resubmit after KO
8/31 OUT x 2!
9/11 2nd DNA Auth
9/25 Pink!
10-10 Visa appointment
10-10 Norma's birthday party in Guatemala!
10-12 Norma and Sara are HOME!!!

********************************
Thank God for a smooth process in Guatemala
Reply With Quote