View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-30-2003, 09:03 PM
Linny's Avatar
Linny Linny is offline
Momma many times over
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,186
Total Points: 65,036.64
Donate
I wouldn't recommend it.....

Most adoptive couples will tell you that to adopt 'out of the birthorder' is tricky, indeed. When adopting a child that is older, there are many, many issues that this child must deal with. Even if the couples have been told that the child has had no 'sexual or physical abuse'.....often is the time that couples will find out otherwise----after placement.
It would probably be unwise, therefore, to subject your daughter to an older, and certainly 'much wiser' child.

There is also the issue of your daughter's placement within the family. She is accustomed to being the only and oldest. It may be very hard for her to adjust to then, being the youngest---with the introduction of an older sib.

And, many couples will tell you that 'the older the child......the tendency for that child to have much more baggage with them'. This has certainly been the case within our family. Issues do not go away after time----and sometimes the issues become bigger over time. Adopting an older child takes adoption to a different level...in that often the parents cannot just 'be parents'.....but must continually be the counselors as well. This is fine and good for many----but it can't be overlooked that this type of parenting requires a LOT of time. Time that will take away from your younger daughter; and being younger (only four or five)....this may be very difficult for her to realize.

Bottom line: stay within the birthorder. Adopt only children, at this point, that would be younger than the daughter you already have. Waiting for youger children may take longer.....but will more than likely be quite worth it in the end for your entire family.

Sincerely,

Linny
Moderator of 'Adopting Again' forum and
Momma to six children:.......international infants, older, special needs, and infant domestic transracial. .....and...hoping to adopt 'one more'. )
Reply With Quote