[dl]

Completely agree that there are alot of problems with this. What I find interesting is that someone that speaks so much of the bmothers love for her child would think that this is a lesser alternative than abortion. At least in this situation, the child lives. Granted there is minimal hope of the child knowing it's biological heritage, but it would at least be alive. To me, women that might take advantage of this "Safe Haven Law" for the most part do not have the support of the bfather. So to ask, "what about the father" is most likely a mute point. If these women had any support at all, they most likely would not need to take advantage of the Safe Haven aspect.