[akcskye]

That's hard to say Michelle, because I don't know your story.

If this was a simple, amicable divorce, then I would see no problem with this, and the initials rather than his name could easily be explained away to your son as your ex not wanting to make his minor child easy to find on the net.

However, with your reaction to it, I sense there is more to it...so if you want to PM me to explain the situation further, you're more than welcome to; however, it is none of my business, honestly, so I will not be offended if you say no, too.

So, with that, I'll go by worst case scenario (at least in my book).

Let's say ex took you to the cleaners, you lost everything, and he emotionally (and perhaps physcially) abused you and your son to the point he's not even allowed to see him for this reason.

If something like this was the case, I can see why you'd be upset, but I can also see why he doesn't see the problem, too.

After all...animosity aside...he is his father, and even though those pictures weren't given to him, it is his son, and if he's not receiving updates on his son (whether by a judge or by your own choices for your family), I can see where he got his temptation.

Does it make it right or excuseable? No.

I realize your son didn't care who saw...but if you really wanted to make a point to your ex if he doesn't see the "personal" point, is that what he did was a violation of copyright.

Your son owns the rights to those pictures, and your husband copied them and redistributed them.

I'm sure that you feel your privacy has been violated, and that is the cause of much of your emotions. It's a very valid argument.

But, like I said, without knowing the whole story, it's hard to make a judgement of "right or wrong" without knowing a little more detail...even if all you said was "yes, he did harm me or my child" would even help.

Because then, I would think "stalker".

IF any of the above drivel of mine makes sense. LOL

(((HUGS)))