View Single Post
  #12  
Old 08-28-2006, 08:01 AM
manni28 manni28 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,107
Total Points: 25,951.75
Donate
I agree with both sides BUT the truth is (IMO) there are A LOT of children that should have been adopted at birth. Look at all of the children in foster care; they could have been spared the agony of abuse/neglect if they were adopted at birth. Yes, adoption includes loss but the main reason for adoption is child’s best interest. In my opinion being a parents is a job that ends with the parents death; not, when the child is 18 or 21-parenting is a life long commitment-even now, at age thirty-eight, I still ask my aparents for advice. Adoption can be good for the child (IMO) if the bparents aren't emotionally and physically ready, and that's a fact!

Quote:
It's hard for me. I had a crappy hand dealt and thankfully made the best out of what could have been a very, very bad thing. Some first families aren't so lucky. Some adoptive families aren't so lucky. And the true sadness lies in the fact that some adoptees/children aren't so lucky either

SchmennaLeigh:

How were you dealt “ a crappy hand"? I'm curious?
Reply With Quote